Develop robust AI systems that won't become liabilities.

Build and manage AI systems that are reliable, secure, and compliant.

The image depicts a professional meeting in a modern conference room with large windows allowing natural light. Five individuals are gathered around a wooden table, engaged in discussion. A woman standing, dressed in a light blue shirt and white pants, appears to be leading the meeting. The seated participants include two men and one woman on one side, and another man on the other side, all taking notes or using laptops. On the wall, a large screen displays a digital interface with charts and code, suggesting the meeting is about an AI-assisted coding platform. The room includes a potted plant and comfortable chairs, with a view of an office building through the windows. Alt-text: A meeting in a modern conference room with five people discussing in front of a screen displaying AI-assisted coding solutions. Transcribed Text: Partial text on the digital interface includes "AI-generated code" and "ML, GenAI, Agentic AI." Additional text on the interface and documents is not clearly visible.

AI is no longer just a lab experiment

of organizations report using AI technology in at least one business function.



McKinsey
0 %
of AI systems score below our recommended build-quality threshold.



(Software Improvement Group)
0 %
of organizations must modernize their data architectures to support real-time AI/ML.



(Dataversity)
20 %
of enterprise organizations are still only experimenting or piloting AI initiatives.



(McKinsey)
0 %

AI is software with unique characteristics

Unlike conventional software, which follows fixed, pre-programmed rules, AI learns, evolves, and makes autonomous decisions. To manage AI-specific risks, AI systems need to adhere to strong engineering practices.

The image depicts an office meeting scene with three individuals in a modern glass-walled conference room. A woman in business attire is standing and presenting information displayed on a large screen, which shows various colorful graphs and data metrics related to AI detection and portfolio overview. Two men are seated at a conference table listening attentively, with notebooks, a laptop, and a small plant on the table. The room is well-lit with natural light streaming in through large windows, creating a bright, open atmosphere. Outside, buildings and clear skies are visible, adding a sense of connectivity to the urban environment. Alt-text: An office meeting with a woman presenting data on a screen while two men listen. Transcribed Text: AI detection 34 systems Using AI Technologies portfolio overview

We see many organizations struggling to transition AI from experimental projects in the lab to scalable, secure, compliant, and maintainable real-world applications. AI also needs regular retraining to stay accurate.

The engineering challenges stem from how AI engineers—such as data scientists—are traditionally managed and trained.

Their focus is often on quickly creating insights and models, not on building systems that are secure, reliable, maintainable, reusable, easy to transfer, or testable.

AI systems often have long, unfocused code blocks handling multiple responsibilities, making them difficult to modify, analyze, and reuse. In addition, due to a lack of testability, errors are harder to detect and AI models are riskier to update. 

Over time, as data and requirements change, adjustments are typically ‘patched on’ rather than properly integrated, making things even more complicated. Furthermore, transferring to another team becomes less feasible.

As AI adoption grows, the underlying architecture becomes just as important as the model. Organizations need a tech stack capable of integrating a wide variety of AI and data inputs.
Modern architectures are key to enable data integration,  (re)training of the model, scalable deployment, and faster, safer experimentation across teams.
Without these foundations, AI initiatives get stuck in prototypes and never make it to production.

In AI systems, teams are often composed mainly of data scientists, whose focus on creating functional models can lead to a lack of software engineering best practices, ultimately causing quality and security issues.

Also, traditional data science development tools offer little support for software engineering best practices. Tools are designed for experiments, not creating maintainable software, and some data science languages lack powerful abstraction and testing mechanisms.

Once the model works, there’s little incentive to improve the code.

Build AI systems on a solid engineering foundation

Detect AI systems across your portfolio

Know exactly which AI technologies are in use

Get complete visibility into AI systems and risks across your organization and connect AI initiatives to business strategy.

Identify specific AI quality issues

Set quality goals that adapt to your AI maturity

Get real-time visibility into quality risks, maintainability, and AI-specific issues.

Be reliable and secure

Design AI systems that won’t become liabilities

Leverage 25+ years of expertise to ensure that the systems you develop and manage are reliable, secure, and scalable.

Transform your AI engineering culture

Bring discipline and consistency to the AI lifecycle

Align with the global standard we helped create, the ISO/IEC 5338. Ensure your AI can go beyond experimentation and in production.

Download the 1-page overview

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
First Name*
Privacy*

How we help

Build and manage AI with the Sigrid® platform

Govern AI systems

Resolve issues and risks specific to AI

Detect AI systems

Identify AI across your portfolio

Set quality objectives

Apply tech-readiness evaluations.

Leverage our benchmark

Achieve desired levels of quality

Point-in-time assessments

AI Practices Assessment (AIPA)

Align your AI development with best practices

Development Assessment (DPA)

Evaluate how your teams build, deploy, and maintain AI systems

AI Software Risk Assessment (SRA)

Get a deep analysis of your AI systems.

Let's build AI systems you can trust.

Related resources

The 5 most common quality pitfalls of AI systems (2025 update)

Learn how typical AI/big data system quality issues need to be fixed in order to prevent a major AI crisis....

Routescanner’s path to trustworthy, transparent AI with Software Improvement Group

How Routescanner validated its AI for neutrality and trust with Software Improvement Group—boosting stakeholder confidence in container routing decisions....

ISO/IEC 5338: Get to know the global standard on AI systems

Learn everything about the international standard on how to develop and manage AI systems: the ISO/IEC 5338 on AI lifecycle....

Frequently Asked Questions

Find answers to common queries below.

Unlike conventional software, which follows fixed, pre-programmed rules, AI learns, evolves, and makes autonomous decisions. 

According to ISO/IEC 5338, co-developed by Software Improvement Group (SIG), AI is classified as a software system with unique characteristics. These include the ability to think autonomously, learn from data, make decisions based on that data, and even potentially talk, see, listen, and move. 

In addition, AI needs regular retraining. 

What sets AI software apart from traditional software is that it doesn’t just follow fixed rules. Instead, it learns by analyzing large sets of data, finding patterns, and using that knowledge to make educated guesses when making decisions, solving problems, or answering questions. 

The AI Practices Assessment (AIPA) benchmarks your AI lifecycle against ISO/IEC 5338, showing whether your development processes are reliable, compliant, and aligned with engineering best practices.

The Development Practices Assessment (DPA) identifies strengths and gaps across people, process, and technology. It highlights where AI development workflows need improvement to support consistency, quality, and scalability.

A Software Risk Assessment (SRA) evaluates system architecture, maintainability, and operational risks. It identifies modernization needs that improve performance, resilience, and long-term sustainability.

Sigrid® provides continuous insight across codebases built on 300+ technologies and 30,000+ systems. It automatically detects AI-related risks and delivers recommendations aligned with ISO standards.

Yes — AI system detection identifies where AI appears across your portfolio, the dependencies involved, and risks tied to AI components. This supports better governance, risk management, and reliable scaling.

Still have questions?

If you have questions that aren’t covered here, feel free to reach out. We’re always happy to help you with more information or clarifications.

Experience Sigrid live

Request your demo of the Sigrid® | Software Assurance Platform:
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Register for access to Summer Sessions

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Privacy*